Fear and Loathing in Executive Pay: The Payouts Should Be as Big as the Challenges

Fear and Loathing in Executive Pay: The Payouts Should Be as Big as the Challenges

We were somewhere around Wall Street when the total compensation package began to take hold. The neon lights of corporate America blurred into a fever dream of golden parachutes, stock options, and the lingering stench of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives gone up in smoke. The old rules were dead—buried under the weight of shareholder revolts, rogue activists, and a Trump administration hell-bent on ripping the wires out of the great American virtue-signaling machine. But in this new reality, one thing remains crystal clear: CEOs who deliver should get paid—and paid handsomely. Because in a world of unprecedented business complexity, the payouts should be as big as the challenges.

The Decadence and the New Reality

Let’s be clear—executive pay isn’t a charity, and it sure as hell isn’t a handout. These aren’t paper-pushing bureaucrats cashing out for clocking in; they’re high-stakes operators making billion-dollar decisions in markets that turn on a dime. The lazy criticism of CEO pay ignores one crucial fact: compensation at the top must be directly tied to results. The era of justifying bloated paychecks with DEI virtue-signaling is over (thankfully), but ESG—the real ESG—is still alive and well, not as a hollow corporate fad but as a fundamental measure of how a company makes its money, not just how much it makes.

Boards have wised up. They know that paying for potential instead of performance is a sucker’s bet, and today’s executive comp plans are evolving to reflect that. Stock grants and long-term incentives have replaced the era of blank-check golden parachutes. The pay-for-performance model isn’t just a slogan—it’s a necessity in a world where shareholders demand results and CEOs are expected to deliver real, measurable impact.

The New Rules of the Game

• Payouts That Match the Stakes:
  • The bigger the challenge, the bigger the reward.
  • CEOs leading complex, global enterprises in an era of AI, geopolitical risk, and market volatility deserve compensation that reflects the enormity of their responsibilities.
• Results Over Rhetoric:
  • Performance-based pay is here to stay. Investors are tired of executives cashing out on empty promises.
  • Compensation plans must be tied to measurable success, not empty gestures.
• Good Governance Over Groupthink:
  • Boards must prioritize fiduciary responsibility over ideological trends.
  • Companies must focus on sustainability and profitability, not just optics.
• The Future of Executive Pay:
  • Those who drive real economic value deserve compensation that reflects their impact.
  • The age of virtue-signaling compensation is over.

The Bottom Line: Pay the Best, Fire the Rest

The future of executive pay isn’t about caving to public outrage or clinging to outdated compensation models — it’s about paying the right leaders the right way. This isn’t a race to the bottom; it’s a recalibration toward pay structures that are as bold, dynamic, and forward-thinking as the executives who earn them.

Because at the end of the day, executive compensation isn’t about what’s “fair” in some abstract moral sense — it’s about what works. And as long as CEOs are delivering results, they should be rewarded accordingly. The critics can scream all they want, but in the end, performance speaks louder than outrage.

FBG